Comments on: ZOMG! Rating system – revisited http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/ Wed, 08 Sep 2010 02:46:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Nana http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-2040 Nana Mon, 04 May 2009 06:53:34 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/#comment-2040 I support this tweak, but not because of the Susie e-mail. I like the idea of differentiating a candy that was fine, but not exciting, from a candy that was barfalicious. I support this tweak, but not because of the Susie e-mail. I like the idea of differentiating a candy that was fine, but not exciting, from a candy that was barfalicious.

]]> By: Justin http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-2031 Justin Sat, 02 May 2009 00:32:25 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/#comment-2031 Nah, let it roll off of you. Susie sounds like she can't really take criticism. She resorted to the egotiscial, blame the consumer when your product is overpriced and underdelivers. Hasn't worked out so well for Sony **CoughPS3***. I like your system, it's a lot more definitive than most. If you really want to change I'll still read. Don't change to cater to others' egos. Hmm...chocolate covered gushers... may warrant an experiment.... Nah, let it roll off of you. Susie sounds like she can’t really take criticism. She resorted to the egotiscial, blame the consumer when your product is overpriced and underdelivers. Hasn’t worked out so well for Sony **CoughPS3***.

I like your system, it’s a lot more definitive than most. If you really want to change I’ll still read. Don’t change to cater to others’ egos. Hmm…chocolate covered gushers… may warrant an experiment….

]]> By: Reg http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-2030 Reg Fri, 01 May 2009 21:34:59 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/#comment-2030 I actually dig the new system. I frequent quite a few candy blogs, including yours, and I've always wondered why it seemed some of your reviews seemed so much lower than everyone else's. That didn't stop me from reading, because I really dig the descriptions, but the pattern always came off as a little unfair--especially when I take a chance and try some of the Os and I think "Wow, these aren't *terrible*. The are actually...kind of okay! Maybe sometimes nice!" I actually dig the new system. I frequent quite a few candy blogs, including yours, and I’ve always wondered why it seemed some of your reviews seemed so much lower than everyone else’s. That didn’t stop me from reading, because I really dig the descriptions, but the pattern always came off as a little unfair–especially when I take a chance and try some of the Os and I think “Wow, these aren’t *terrible*. The are actually…kind of okay! Maybe sometimes nice!”

]]> By: Pam Walter http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-2027 Pam Walter Fri, 01 May 2009 16:56:07 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/zomg-rating-system-revisited/#comment-2027 I like your system. The definitions sound just like the opinions I have about candy when I eat it. I like your system. The definitions sound just like the opinions I have about candy when I eat it.

]]>