http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/ Wed, 22 May 2013 17:14:57 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-2049 Deb Tue, 05 May 2009 16:31:52 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/#comment-2049 I think your reviews were, as always, fair and well written. I can’t think of a single person who would love every single chocolate in an assorted box of truffles, and you were very eloquent in your critiques.

]]> http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-2047 Leslie Tue, 05 May 2009 12:33:35 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/#comment-2047 How rude of them!

]]> http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-2038 mac Sun, 03 May 2009 04:05:37 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/#comment-2038 wow. your reviews didn’t make me think anything bad about this company but that email sure did! laaame.

]]> http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/comment-page-1/#comment-2029 amy Fri, 01 May 2009 21:08:42 +0000 http://zomgcandy.com/2009/05/01/schocolat-part-iii/#comment-2029 i thought your reviews were good. why were they so offended? it’s not as if you wrote that you got a box of their chocolates and it was all nasty. you wrote terrific descriptions and included your tasting notes. some were neutral and other were quite favorable. i still don’t get why they were so offended. sheesh. touchy touchy.

]]>